Weather Modification: Chemical and Electric Weather Control Exposed. Ground based cloud seeding generators, plane based cloud seeding flares, and cloud ionization antenna towers.

Weather Modification: Chemical and Electric Weather Control

Weather modification is a worldwide industry with airplane and ground-based cloud-seeding generators burning chemicals to add more seeds to clouds with the hope that these aerosols will create rain, snow, or even make hail smaller. Billions of dollars are spent each year on this completely unpredictable practice. In the sections below you can learn the terminology, see government reports of actual weather modification experiments, check out weather modification conferences, read a list of weather modification patents, and see a corporate roster of companies involved in controlling your weather.



Cloud Seeding

Vincent Schaefer, Irving Langmuir, and Bernard Vonnegut invented cloud seeding November 13, 1946 at the General Electrics Laboratory. The idea behind cloud seeding is actually very simple: add cloud condensation nuclei to rain clouds and produce additional rainfall. In practice cloud seeding has never produced scientific proof of predictable results (efficacy). Glaciogenic Cloud Seeding involves the injection of ice-producing materials into a supercooled cloud to stimulate precipitation by ice particle growth. The objective of glaciogenic seeding is to introduce seeding material that will produce the optimum concentration of ice crystals for precipitation formation. This is usually achieved by planes burning pyrotechnic flares that release silver iodide. The intent of glaciogenic seeding of orographic clouds (or clouds that develop in response to the forced lifting of air by topographical features on the earth's surface) is to introduce aerosol into a cloud to alter the natural development of cloud particles and enhance wintertime precipitation in a targeted region. This is usually achieved by ground based cloud seeding generators that release silver iodide into clouds using updrafts near mountains.


Does Cloud Seeding Work?

Cloud seeding companies promise claim the ability to fill reservoirs, make hail smaller (crop protection), and even to remove smog despite the scientific community repeatedly stating that cloud seeding is completely unpredictable (lacks scientific efficacy).

“Although 40 years have passed since the first NAS report on weather modification, this Committee finds itself very much in concurrence with the findings of that assessment… We conclude that the initiation of large-scale operational weather modification programs would be premature. Many fundamental problems must be answered first. It is unlikely that these problems will be solved by the expansion of present efforts, which emphasize the a posteriori evaluation of largely uncontrolled experiments. We believe the patient investigation of the atmospheric processes coupled with an exploration of the technological applications may eventually lead to useful weather modification, but we emphasize that the time-scale required for success may be measured in decades.”

National Research Council, et al. "Critical issues in weather modification research."" National Academies Press, (2003).

The Weather Modification Association’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Titled, “Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research”DOWNLOAD PDF

“It was concluded that tests conducted so far have not yet provided either the statistical or physical evidence required to establish that the seeding concepts have been scientifically proven.”

The change in the timing (and location) and/or increased intensity of the rain or alteration in the size spectrum of raindrops may produce an enhanced downdraft, the gust front from which will trigger the successive development of more vigorous second-, third-, and fourth-generation cells than those from unseeded clouds, and they will produce more rain than their unseeded counterparts.

Silverman, Bernard A. "A critical assessment of hygroscopic seeding of convective clouds for rainfall enhancement." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 84.9 (2003): 1219-1230. • DOWNLOAD PDF

In 2007, the EAA approved cloud seeding efforts for the ninth year in a row, and for the first time the program included a method to statistically evaluate the project’s effectiveness. Four Board members voted against continuing the program, saying there was evidence that cloud seeding could actually decrease rainfall by accident, and they also had concerns about the EAA paying for scientific studies to investigate something the National Academy had already concluded doesn’t work.

The Edwards Aquifer – Cloud Seeding (2007)

“Purposeful augmentation of precipitation, reduction of hail damage, dispersion of fog and other types of cloud and storm modifications by cloud seeding are developing technologies which are still striving to achieve a sound scientific foundation.

"Executive Summary of the WMO Statement on Weather Modification." World Meteorological Society Expert Team on Weather Modification Research, (2010). • DOWNLOAD PDF

Analysis showed that cloud seeding produced a 3 percent increase in precipitation with a 28 percent probability that this result happened by chance. Most scientists and statisticians wouldn’t accept that level of uncertainty, says Breed, who was part of the NCAR team that analyzed the results, but for water managers in drought-prone areas, it’s a different story. “If you say, I’m 70 percent confident that this will have an impact, well, a lot of them will think that’s not too bad.”

"Draft Exectutive Summary, The Wyoming Weather Modification Pilot Program." Wyoming Water Developement Commision, (2014).DOWNLOAD PDF3D MapMore Info

It is necessary to point out that many attempts and experiments to modify the atmospheric processes and weather phenomena have been made in the previous century. However, both geoengineering and weather modification are considered outside the scope of control theory. This gives rise to a number of very important problems, which are currently only formulated in general terms, such as problems related to the validation of the input and output variables, determination of the boundaries of both geoengineering activities and weather modification, statement of climate and weather manipulation goals as well as methods of achieving the objectives.

Soldatenko, Sergei, and Rafael Yusupov. "On the possible use of geophysical cybernetics in climate manipulation (geoengineering) and weather modification." WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 11 (2015): 116-125. • DOWNLOAD PDF

Although this study focuses only on three cases, the results are a fundamental step toward understanding cloud seeding efficacy that, for over half a century, has been an unanswered question for water managers wishing to utilize the technology for water resource management.

Friedrich, Katja, et al. "Quantifying snowfall from orographic cloud seeding." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117.10 (2020): 5190-5195. • DOWNLOAD PDF • See also: Cloud Seeding Really Does Work – But Only Makes Enough Snow to Dust Your Eyelashes

The Israel 4 experiment was stopped a year earlier than planned, because the result was disappointing: a 1.8% increase, p value = 0.4, and 95% confidence interval of (−11%, 16%). These results led to a decision by the Israel Water Authority to stop operational seeding.

Benjamini, Yoav, et al. "The Israel 4 Cloud Seeding Experiment: Primary Results." Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 62.3 (2023): 317-327. • DOWNLOAD PDF

Cloud Ionization

Cloud ionization companies use antennas and lasers to change the electric properties of aerosols to affect weather. Cloud ionizer antennas release negatively charged ions which are intended to attract water vapor to condense on aerosols, possibly creating clouds and precipitation. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico claims to use cloud ionization "palm tree" antennas to protect the facility from lightning strikes saying that the technology traces back to 1913. [1] “In Tesla’s application, he included some sketches,” Neece said. “One of the sketches included something that vaguely looked like a palm tree.” Finally, the U.S. Department of Agriculture sprayed electrified tap water over Texas in an atempt to make it rain.

Does Cloud Ionization Work?

“It should be realised that the energy involved in weather systems is so large that it is impossible to create cloud systems that rain, alter wind patterns to bring water vapour into a region, or completely eliminate severe weather phenomena. Weather Modification technologies that claim to achieve such large scale or dramatic effects do not have a sound scientific basis (e.g. hail canons, ionization methods) and should be treated with suspicion”

World Meteorological Society – Executive Summary of the WMO Statement on Weather Modification (2010)

Steering Atmospheric Rivers

Miles Research (formerly aquiess), Climate Control Global Trading LLC, and China's Tianhe ("sky river") Project all claim the ability to alter the direction and flow of atmospheric rivers using electromagnetic signals.

Weather Warfare

Operation Popeye's weather warfare project was conducted from Thailand over Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam and was allegedly sponsored by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and CIA without the authorization of then Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird who said "we have never engaged in that type of activity [weather modification] over Northern Vietnam" in Congressional testimony. The top secret weather modification operations were conducted by military WC-130 planes and RF-4 jets spraying silver iodide and lead iodide into monsoon storm clouds. Operation Popeye first came to public light in March 1971, when reporter Jack Anderson published The Pentagon Papers and a story in the New York Times based on a secret 1967 memo (below) from the Joint Chiefs of Staff to President Johnson. The memo read:

ACTIONS: “LAOS OPERATIONS – Continue as at present plus Operation POP EYE to reduce the trafficability along infiltration routes” & AUTHORITIES/POLICY CHANGE: “Authorization required to implement operational phase of weather modification process previously successfully tested and evaluated in same area”. (US Senate, Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment; 26 July 1972; p. 5).

After disclosure of Operation Popeye it was renamed to Operation Motorpool, Operation Intermediary and finally Operation Compatriot. These operations led to several congressional hearings led by Senator Claiborne Pell, The Weather Modification Reporting Act of 1972, the National Weather Modification Policy Act of 1976, The Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD) Weather Warfare Ban of 1978, and a full disclosure report titled "Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential."

President Kennedy United Nations Address On Weather Modification
President Lyndon Johnson Approves Weather Warfare
Weather Modification Technologies


Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN)

Cloud condensation nuclei or CCNs (also known as cloud seeds) are small particles typically 0.2 µm, or 1/100th the size of a cloud droplet on which water vapor condenses. Water requires a non-gaseous surface to make the transition from a vapour to a liquid; this process is called condensation. Typical cloud seeds are dust, minerals, mold, bacteria, metals, black carbon, and silver iodide (the most widely used CCN in cloud seeding projects).

Ice Nucleating Particles (INPs)

Ice formation (like cirrus clouds) can proceed via heterogeneous (different types of particles) nucleation aided by aerosol particles known as ice nucleating particles (INPs). Many different types of atmospheric particulate matter can act as ice nuclei, both natural and anthropogenic (man-made), including those composed of desert dust, soot, organic matter, bacteria (e.g. Pseudomonas syringae), pollen, fungal spores and volcanic ash amongst others.


An aerosol is a suspension of fine solid particles or liquid droplets, in air or another gas. Aerosols can be natural or anthropogenic (man-made). Examples of natural aerosols are fog, dust, forest exudates and geyser steam. Examples of anthropogenic aerosols are haze, particulate air pollutants and smoke.


Ionization or ionisation, is the process by which an atom or a molecule acquires a negative or positive charge by gaining or losing electrons, often in conjunction with other chemical changes. Rainfall requires three things: a cloud seed, water vapor, and ionization (or static electricity, to make water vapor stick to the cloud seed). Ionization can come from natural sources like galactic cosmis rays (GCR) or man-made sources like antennas and lasers.

Atmospheric Rivers

Atmospheric rivers are relatively long, narrow regions in the atmosphere – like rivers in the sky – that transport most of the water vapor outside of the tropics. These columns of vapor move with the weather, carrying an amount of water vapor roughly equivalent to the average flow of water at the mouth of the Mississippi River. When the atmospheric rivers make landfall, they often release this water vapor in the form of rain or snow.

Official Government Weather Modification Reports

U.S. Government Weather Modification Project Reports

The Weather Modification Reporting Act of 1972 requires everyone in the United States of America to report weather modification activities to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). For a detailed analysis, check out our spreadsheet of Reported Weather Modification Activities in the USA (2004-2012)Excel SpreadsheetAdobe PDF • with sponsors (who paid for the weather control), operators (who manipulated the weather), where it happened, when, and why.

Texas Weather Modification Project Reports

All individuals and organizations intending to conduct weather modification activities are required to obtain a weather modification license and permit from TDLR. Contact Adam Foster at (512) 202-8167 or for assistance with the licensing and permitting of weather modification operations.

The Department relies on its staff, as well as the Weather Modification Advisory Committee, for recommendations on applications for weather modification licenses and permits. The Committee, consisting of an engineer, people in business, an attorney at law, and an agricultural producer, meets several times each year, usually in Austin, to review applications for licenses and permits.

For more information about the weather modification program, e-mail TDLR at

Jim Lee, ClimateViewer News
Jim Lee
Creator of ClimateViewer News

“I am forever a Boy Scout, lifetime artist, nocturnal programmer, music is my life, love is my religion, and I am the luckiest husband and father on Earth. I speak for the trees. I have a passion for mapping, magnets, and mysteries.”

About Jim Lee


WIPP protects infrastructure with metal palm trees
NOAA Central Library • Weather Modification Project Reports
NOAA Corporate Services • Individuals Engaged in Weather Modification Activities, COMMERCE/NOAA-8 (ARCHIVE)
World Meteorological Organization Expert Team on Weather Modification
World Meteorological Organization Expert Team on Weather Modification (ARCHIVE)

Broken Links

If any of the links above do not work, copy the URL and paste it into the form below to check the Wayback Machine for an archived version of that webpage.


See pollution, privacy concerns, weather modification & geoengineering experiments, and more. Monitor your world and view satellite imagery in real-time!


We use cookies from third party services (YouTube and Disqus Comments). Read their privacy policies and how you can disable these services by clicking "Privacy Preferences".

Privacy Preferences