The most extensive research on Geoengineering and Weather Modification experiments worldwide, with articles, maps, and timelines to fully expose the hidden world of Weather Control.
Below is a table of contents for my research regarding climate engineering, links to my maps and timeline, and my solution: The Environmental Modification Accountability Act.
Geoengineering the sky has been a worldwide phenomenon since the start of commercial aviation. Ships and jet aircraft are covering our skies in man-made clouds. Despite 60 years of jet planes making clouds, aviation-induced cloudiness, persistent contrails, contrail cirrus, and aerosol-cloud interaction are barely understood with today’s best supercomputers and are not properly accounted for in IPCC models. The aviation industry knows this, and jet aircraft-produced contrail cirrus clouds are now being actively experimented on using two main concepts: doping jet fuel with sulfur and cirrus cloud seeding to melt these clouds away. Contrail cirrus clouds trap heat and likely are a greater threat than CO2 so scientists are experimenting with jet biofuels and flight routing to engineer clouds that cool the planet. This active experiment goes on everyday, over your heads, with over 100,000 flights a day worldwide and zero accountability.
Space Weather Modification is also gaining more publicity. When upper atmospheric nuclear explosions were banned back in the 1950’s, the U.S. military still hell bent on replacing our fickle ionosphere with something more reliable decided to dump millions of needles in space to create their own. The West Ford Needles project failed, and to this day millions of needles can be found floating in space or buried in ice at our poles. Next the military began using sounding rockets and satellites to create heavy ion clouds in space by dumping Barium, Strontium, and Sulfur Hexaflouride into our ionosphere. Military radio technicians could heat these chemical releases in space with the ionospheric heater at Arecibo, Puerto Rico and “see” our ionosphere. Today, the top ionospheric heater worldwide HAARP fires electromagnetic missiles into our Van Allen belts and scrapes out radiation using the “Christofilos Effect” learned back in the 1950’s nuclear blasts. Dubbed “radiation belt remediation” ionospheric heaters are sold to politicians and the public as a back up plan for Solar Flares or High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse attacks, however foreign governments are very concerned about the military capabilities of these ionospheric heaters, with the Russian government going as far as to say HAARP could “have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating entire regions.” Despite these dire warnings, the practice of heating chemical releases in space is just “a conspiracy theory.”
This page is an effort to raise awareness of atmospheric experimentation and to lobby for transparency in the geoengineering and weather modification industries, and hopefully to see an end to weather control efforts, both intentional and unintentional, in hopes that one day my child will see natural weather.
Let one thing in nature stay natural, hand’s off our sky.
- Learn the history of weather modification with our Interactive Timeline
- Learn about current geoengineering projects check out our map.
- Get involved in Ken Caldeira’s Geoengineering Group like I have: read my comments
- Tell people about this page and share with your friends!
- Spread the word about our solution, “The Environmental Modification Accountability Act of 2018” and help us make this law a reality!
Geoengineering SRM Sponsors & Authors
Weather Modification and Geoengineering Fact Sheets
Geoengineering programs, proposals, experiments, field trials, and weather modification programs worldwide.
Geoengineering researchers, universities, companies, and weather modification derivatives trading.
“The emissions and the climate change that we’re causing with that is already a massive experiment on our world that we don’t really know the outcome of. So I don’t think we should start another set of experiments and go into geoengineering. I think we should get our act together and reduce our emissions.” U.N. Assistant Secretary-General Janos PasztorGeoengineering is the term associated with technology used to address climate change and global warming with solutions ranging from painting roofs white, to genetically modified crops that reflect light, dumping iron in the ocean to make algae grow, pumping salt into clouds to make them shiny, and even mirrors in space and acid clouds to block the sun.
We at ClimateViewer News oppose all methods of geoengineering which include spraying our skies with chemicals or making clouds to block sunlight. You cannot solve pollution problems with more pollution.
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is the process of blocking and reflecting sunlight with man-made chemicals like Aluminum, Sulfur, Titanium, and even Diamond Dust. Scientists seek to mimic volcanoes and cool our planet despite the obvious moral and legal implications. (see this presentation)
The most obvious reason that global weather control with Geoengineering SRM can not happen in the next decade is simple: Nobody has been able to prove the efficacy of cloud-seeding for over 60 years.
Cloud seeding companies promise crop protection and boast of the ability to fill reservoirs, make hail smaller, and even to remove smog despite the scientific community’s repeatedly stating that cloud seeding is completely unpredictable.
“Although 40 years have passed since the first NAS report on weather modification, this Committee finds itself very much in concurrence with the findings of that assessment… We conclude that the initiation of large-scale operational weather modification programs would be premature. Many fundamental problems must be answered first. It is unlikely that these problems will be solved by the expansion of present efforts, which emphasize the a posteriori evaluation of largely uncontrolled experiments. We believe the patient investigation of the atmospheric processes coupled with an exploration of the technological applications may eventually lead to useful weather modification, but we emphasize that the time-scale required for success may be measured in decades.”
National Science Foundation – Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research (2003)
“It was concluded that tests conducted so far have not yet provided either the statistical or physical evidence required to establish that the seeding concepts have been scientifically proven.” American Meteorological Society – Critical Assessment of Hygroscopic Seeding of Convective Clouds for Rainfall Enhancement (2003)
“It should be realised that the energy involved in weather systems is so large that it is impossible to create cloud systems that rain, alter wind patterns to bring water vapour into a region, or completely eliminate severe weather phenomena. Weather Modification technologies that claim to achieve such large scale or dramatic effects do not have a sound scientific basis (e.g. hail canons, ionization methods) and should be treated with suspicion” “Purposeful augmentation of precipitation, reduction of hail damage, dispersion of fog and other types of cloud and storm modifications by cloud seeding are developing technologies which are still striving to achieve a sound scientific foundation.” World Meteorological Society – Executive Summary of the WMO Statement on Weather Modification (2010)
In 2007, the EAA approved cloud seeding efforts for the ninth year in a row, and for the first time the program included a method to statistically evaluate the project’s effectiveness. Four Board members voted against continuing the program, saying there was evidence that cloud seeding could actually decrease rainfall by accident, and they also had concerns about the EAA paying for scientific studies to investigate something the National Academy had already concluded doesn’t work. The Edwards Aquifer – Cloud Seeding
It is necessary to point out that many attempts and experiments to modify the atmospheric processes and weather phenomena have been made in the previous century. However, both geoengineering and weather modification are considered outside the scope of control theory. This gives rise to a number of very important problems, which are currently only formulated in general terms, such as problems related to the validation of the input and output variables, determination of the boundaries of both geoengineering activities and weather modification, statement of climate and weather manipulation goals as well as methods of achieving the objectives. On the Possible Use of Geophysical Cybernetics in Climate Manipulation (Geoengineering) and Weather Modification
Analysis showed that cloud seeding produced a 3 percent increase in precipitation with a 28 percent probability that this result happened by chance. Most scientists and statisticians wouldn’t accept that level of uncertainty, says Breed, who was part of the NCAR team that analyzed the results, but for water managers in drought-prone areas, it’s a different story. “If you say, I’m 70 percent confident that this will have an impact, well, a lot of them will think that’s not too bad.” Wyoming Weather Modification Pilot Program – Executive Summary – 3D Map – Mobile Map
For a detailed analysis, check out our spreadsheet of Reported Weather Modification Activities in the USA (2004-2012) with Sponsors (who paid for the weather control), Operators (who manipulated the weather), where it happened, and when: NOAA Corporate Services - Individuals Engaged in Weather Modification Activities, COMMERCE/NOAA-8 [DELETED]
- 2004 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs
- 2005 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs
- 2006 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs
- 2007 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs
- 2008 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs
- 2009 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs
- 2010 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs
- 2011 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs (partial)
- 2012 • NOAA Weather Modification Programs (partial)
- 1989 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1990 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1991 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1992 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1993-1994 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1995 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1996 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1997-1998 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 1999 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 2000 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 2001-2002 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 2003-2004 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
- 2005-2006 • WMO Register of National Weather Modification Projects
American Meteorological Society (AMS) Weather Modification Conferences
- 2001 • 15th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification
- 2005 • 16th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification
- 2008 • 17th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification
- 2011 • 18th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification
- 2013 • 19th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification
- 2015 • 20th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification
- 2018 • 21st Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification - [VIDEO INTERVIEWS]
Check out the following Geoengineering and Weather Modification maps to see where the Climate Changers are experimenting with your weather.
Geoengineering Solutionmy solution to the problem of rogue geoengineering, weather warfare, and geophysical weaponry. Help expose the secret world of climate engineering by learning the history, teaching your friends, and sharing this page. Together we will bring clarity to our increasingly chaotic skies.
FCC spectrum auction threatens hurricane prediction and weather satellites and a new paper from David Keith gets massive coverage claiming geoengineering may be safer now as the UN fails to act on geoengineering governance.
THIS IS THE PROOF YOU'VE BEEN WAITING FOR! This Technocrat's wet dream brags about controlling storms with electromagnetic weather control and have created a cryptocurrency 'The Climate CRON' to pay for water on demand!
WQAD weather guy Eric Sorensen mocks people for using the word chemtrail in a horrendous click-bait video on Facebook. Time to break down the words and science behind artificial clouds and aircraft pollution.
Geoengineering Watch tries to lie about plagiarism, while gatekeeping ClimateViewer and Weather Modification History. See the full history of Dane's bad behavior and constant attacks on fellow anti-geoengineering websites.
The goal of the chemtrail conspiracy is clear: keep people distracted while scientists and the military experiment in our sky with cloud making planes and ship tracks! The agenda in a nutshell: more clouds by day, none by night.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta co-founded the Energy Future Coalition Steering Committee in 2002 and the latest DC Leaks contain a March 2015 meeting where they discuss how to fund geoengineering studies!
Weather, of course, is hard to predict and several of the computer models and maps are showing temperatures well above freezing – indicating global warming – but people in the areas where temperatures are in the 50’s and mid 40’s are getting iced and piled with snow.
The Environmental Protection Agency held a public hearing its Washington, D.C., headquarters to hear from environmental groups, aircraft industry representatives, private citizens and others on their reactions to the agency’s newly-released carbon emissions standards for commercial aircraft.
If the Anthropocene is an age where human desire affects nature on a global scale, then how can we save civilization by transforming outer nature (i.e. climate engineering) if we do not simultaneously transform inner nature?
If any of the links above do not work, copy the URL and paste it into the form below to check the Wayback Machine for an archived version of that webpage.