Video Details

Setting The Record Straight, A Response To False Accusations - GEOENGINEERINGWATCH.ORG

It is truly unfortunate that some individuals feel the need to try and gain attention by habitually lying and making false claims. It is unfortunate that I was finally forced to take time away from the front line of the fight against geoengineering in order to set the record straight. Mr. Jim Lee has repeatedly claimed that he was the sole producer of a climate engineering patents list in 2011. Mr. Lee further claimed that “stole” his patents list in 2012. Both of Mr. Lee’s claims are blatant lies.

Geoengineering Watch completely upgraded our website in 2012, and thus the link to our current patents list carries a 2012 date. But when does the record confirm that the patents list were first posted? February 1st of 2010, a full year BEFORE Mr. Lee claims to have put together his list. How can this be proven when the earlier website and link were taken down in 2012? The archival link below is proof positive of the posting of a patents list on February 1st, 2010.

FYI, the screenshot of the banner shown verifies the original posting date, the link below the banner access the full archival patent posting from February 1st, 2010. A PDF of the archival post is also attached. - ARCHIVE.ORG


NOTE: Nowhere in this article did Dane link to my website, because God forbid you see any of my research. Dane will delete your comment and ban you if you link to or or on his website or social media. That is why his smear article simply refers to me as Mr. Lee. YOU SCARED, SAY YOU SCARED.


Aw nah, y’all done up and done it. Back then they didn’t want me, now I’m hot they all on me:

This is a patethic attempt to CYA. Though it may be true that you had “a patent list” on your website in 2010, you replaced it with MY patent list in 2012. You attempt to obfuscate this by only showing the WaybackMachine timeline entry and not the actual post itself. Further, the links you provide to do not work:

Dane's broken link

Dane's broken link

Here is the working link to your “original patent list” and it looks nothing like what you stole from my site:

But why bother with that? You still have the original page on your website, live:


I filed a Digital Millenium Copyright Act claim against Dane for plagiarizing my work only to find out that GoDaddy’s response was: you cannot copyright a list. You learn something new everyday. Dane’s lawyer sent me a nasty-gram which was totally bogus and I ignored it entirely.

Dane's Lawyer

Regardless, after spending three months creating my list of patents, it could not be copyrighted because I posted it in a list on a blog. When I finish my patent list (2003-2018) and post it on, it will not be in a form that can be plagiarized again.


Just as Dane did, I based my patent list on the work of Lorie Kramer, originally posted in 2003:

However, none of here patents had links to the originals and I expanded on her work greatly

Compare my patent list to the Lorie and Dane’s original patent list above:

All three patent lists end in 2003, mainly because I was exhausted after finding all those links and did not feel like going any further.

I posted this updated (with links) patent list November 28, 2011 on my first blog in one of the longest blog posts ever:

A year later, Dane copy-pasted my work to his “new” website and did not cite me.

Checking the shows that originally this page was posted August 6, 2012 and still hadn’t included my plagiarized version:

Then on December 5, 2012 he “re-worked” my patent list and posted it on his “new patent list” page:

Note that the 1891 patent is in his current version but wasn’t even in the first version he plagiarized.

Why lie about this Dane? Why not just admit you got the list with hyperlinks from me?

Am I the only one you plagiarized? NOPE!


When Dane first posted this, he actually gave credit to Dutchsinse:

Updated and reposted: 4/24/2012 – Posted originally on May 6, 2011 by dutchsinse

He has since removed that:

Originally copied from:

Dane does this to many activists, steals their work and removes any links back to the original but blatantly demands links back to his work:

May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story. Climate Engineering Cover-Up: Geoengineering Over Our Oceans

Why is Dane speaking out now?

He is fighting back after I debunked his latest video and mentioned the patent plagiarism:

Ship Tracks: Bunker Fuel, Dirty Clouds, and Blatant Lies!


Dane Wigington vs Max Bliss:

Dane Wigington Has Mr. Max Bliss Channel Terminated (via Copyright Claim on Mt. Shasta Meeting Video)

I personally called Dane to ask him to retract the copyright strike so Max didn’t lose his 10,000+ subscribers to which Dane replied: “Hell no.”

Max Bliss is a close friend, an exemplary researcher, attended the EPA hearing on Flight Pollution with me in 2015, and I recently interviewed him:

Max has since deleted his Facebook account to avoid the drama but emails me with research links daily.

Dane Wigington vs Michael Murphy, Kim Moore, and Weather War 101

Setting The Record Straight For Those That Truly Care About The Battle To Stop Climate Engineering

Michael’s addiction to street drugs came to my attention in March of 2012 when he was incoherent for two days. During this time Michael’s now former wife called me numerous times (pleading for help) and Michael’s other close friends to inform us that the addiction was severe and ongoing. When Michael sobered up I made it clear to him that he had to seek intervention or I could no longer be associated with him. The rest of Michael’s immediate circle took the same position. Unfortunately, Michael chose the drugs. “

RETRACTED: Dane Wigington Loses Chemtrail Followers - Harold Saive

Although many of Dane’s comments fail to agree with Carnicom’s published work we can no longer afford to maintain division in this important movement. - Harold Saive, Chemtrails Planet

Dane Wigington vs Weather War 101:

And just for laughs:

Though WW101 and I have had differences over the years, I have always supported his work. He has since deleted his website and discontinued making videos on YouTube. Check out his videos here:

Dane Wigington vs G. Edward Griffin

After announcing that I would be attending Mr. Griffin’s meeting Global Warming: An Inconvenient Lie” Dane attacked Mr. Griffin (because he’s too scared to debate me). Big mistake:

Updated, Is Global Warming “An Inconvenient Lie”? A Public Response to Ed Griffin

Then Mr. Griffin punches back:

G. Edward Griffin Responds to Attack by Dane Wigington

Dane Wigington vs Patrick Wood, author Technocracy Rising

Patrick Wood also conveniently attended the Global Warming: An Inconvenient Lie summit that Ed Griffin organized, so it was no surpise that Dane set him up to screw him over. Mr. Wood was unaware when he joined this show that there was even going to be a debate:

Climate Engineering And Climate Collapse, A Live Debate On WBAI Radio In New York

This one hour live debate on WBAI radio in New York (hosted by Geoff Brady) presents two opposing positions and conclusions regarding the state of the climate and the biosphere. Dane Wigington (lead researcher from and Patrick Wood (author of the book Technocracy Rising) debate the facts. The significance of the threat posed by ongoing global climate engineering operations is addressed, along with the role that climate engineering operations are playing in the rapidly unfolding climate / biosphere collapse, which Mr. Patrick Wood denies is occurring.

what a jackass he is. I wish you were in on the debate. they ambushed me by not telling me what the program was or who was going to be on it. - Patrick Wood, May 3, 2018


Arctic Methane Emergency Group

  1. Try to maintain or even enhance the current cooling effect from currently emitted sulphate aerosols in the troposphere at mid to high northern latitudes.  For example the regulation to ban bunker fuel for ships should be relaxed while encouraging continued use of bunker fuel where the resulting aerosol emissions might be beneficial.  Reduction of sulphate aerosol ‘pollution’ will be unpopular with many environment groups, but the priority to cool the Arctic has to be established.
  2. Establish the positive and negative net forcing from contrails, and encourage flight paths of commercial airplanes to reduce positive or increase negative net forcing.  The ban on polar flights, lifted recently, should be reintroduced. (Editors Note: Weather and Climate Engineering – William Cotton at the AMS )
  1. Prepare the supply and logistics for spraying aerosol precursor in large quantities, preferably into the lower stratosphere, for deployment by next March or April (not sooner because the risk of ozone depletion).  Of course, possible negative impacts have to be considered before large scale deployment, but it is worth being fully prepared for such deployment on the assumption that this technique can be made to work effectively.
  2. Develop and test the deployment of suitably reflective particles, of such materials as TiO2, as alternative or supplement to sulphate aerosol.  Prepare for large scale deployment.   
  3. Finance the development of, and deployment capability for, marine cloud brightening, with a view to deployment on a large scale in spring 2013 – assuming that is the earliest conceivable time.  The main technical problem seems to be with the jets, so experts from major companies in the ink-jet technology field need to be brought in.  Boats and land installations need to be kitted out.
  4. Finance the development and deployment capability for cirrus cloud removal, since this is a promising technique.  Suitable chemicals need to be identified/confirmed, with stock-piling of these cloud seeding chemicals.  Aircraft need to be kitted out to spray these chemicals.
  5. Finance brainstorming sessions for geoengineering, with top scientists and engineers, such as to suggest further measures, improvements to above techniques and the development of other intervention ideas.
  6. Finance the research and trials of all promising techniques for helping to cool the Arctic, including the three geoengineering techniques above.  Update Earth System models to deal with the actualities of sea ice retreat, such that the effects of different techniques can be modelled and optimum joint deployment strategies established.
- AMEG Strategic Plan

Geoengineering Watch = Methane Doom Believers

Google Search: methane - About 2,660 results

Dane supports work of YouTube channel The HAARP Report, who is also an AMEG supporter:

Google Search: “haarp report” - About 41 results


Dane says methane is going to kill us all, The HAARP Report tells us what to do about it. That is how a conman and shill work together: The conman sets the stage and the shill sets the action.

A confidence trick is also known as a con game, a con, a scam, a grift, a hustle, a bunko (or bunco), a swindle, a flimflam, a gaffle or a bamboozle. The intended victims are known as "marks", "suckers", "stooge", "mugu", "rube" or "gulls" (i.e., gullible). When accomplices are employed, they are known as shills.
A shill, also called a plant or a stooge, is a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization. Shills can carry out their operations in the areas of media, journalism, marketing, confidence games, or other business areas. A shill may also act to discredit opponents or critics of the person or organization in which they have a vested interest through character assassination or other means.
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It's simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we've been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over, you almost never get it back.”
— Carl Sagan
Read Fake News, Propaganda, and Acvitism

The HAARP Report calls for geoengineering the artic to save us from methane doom:

"Use Solar Radiation Management over the Arctic Ocean, but only in summer, to prevent complete melting"

Start at 18 minutes, 51 seconds:

Concrete Actions to Stop Chemtrails, Haarp, and Prevent Runaway Arctic Methane Venting

HAARP Report: Chemtrails bad, Geoengineering SRM good?


Dane you are a divider as well as a plagiarist and a liar.

We agree on one thing: climate engineering needs to end and be banned forever more.

We disagree on how you treat our community. You are no king, you are not alone, and your actions are being documented well. People are turning against you because you have repeatedly shown that you are all about YOURSELF, not the movement or solutions.

How’s that lawsuit working out for you?

I will continue my work on and The Environmental Modification Accountability Act and eagerly await your response to my request for a debate. You have much to answer for.

Broken Links

If any of the links above do not work, copy the URL and paste it into the form below to check the Wayback Machine for an archived version of that webpage.

Sharing is Caring

Support ClimateViewer

Donate on PayPal
Support ClimateViewer
Donate on GoFundMe

Reuse License

Creative Commons LicenseDane Wigington's Patent Plagiarism and Attacks on Fellow Activists by Jim Lee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at

You are free to:

  • • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
  • • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.


Barium, Strontium, and Trimethyl-Aluminum chemical releases from the NASA-funded Auroral Zone Upwelling Rocket Experiment, or AZURE. ... Continue reading

What do these have in common? CONTROL. Find out the truth about the CLIMATE CHANGERS, national sovereignty, and one world government of a borderless world. ... Continue reading

ClimateViewer TV

PLEASE SUBSCRIBEJim Lee & ClimateViewer on YouTube

Jim Lee speaking at the US. EPA hearing on flight pollution