PRESENTED AT THE RED PILL EXPO IN SPOKANE, WASHINGTON. JUNE 21-23, 2018. GET TICKETS OR WATCH THE LIVESTREAM
Thank you to Mr. G. Edward Griffin and all those who have taken the Red Pill. My name is Jim Lee, from ClimateViewer News at climateviewer.com and I have an important message about Geoengineering and Breaking the Water Cycle.
Climate Change advocates are single-mindedly focused on CO2 as a cause of all our current and future woes, but I believe this is a grand deception with a nefarious purpose: It’s all about the control of water. While billions are spent on geoengineering research, very little attention is given to the main problems: our oceans, trees, and bacteria which are essential to our natural water cycle.
Clean drinking water is becoming scarce and our skies are constantly under attack from those who seek to control the distribution of rain. As retired Col. David Kutchinski said it:
Fresh water has been dubbed “Blue Gold” in many publications as potable water will be to this century what oil was to the last century.
For this reason I have meticulously researched the topic of climate engineering and created the world’s most thorough website on the subject: https://weathermodificationhistory.com with a timeline covering 1800 to present. While you and your CO2 emissions are blamed for extreme weather events, increasingly powerful hurricanes, and other life-threatening events related to climate change, nobody knows about the Climate Changers.
It is my belief that globalist technocrats and their “Climate Intervention” technologies, which have been in use for over 100 years, are deliberately trying to replace the natural water cycle with a scientifically controlled weather manipulation system that will pick and choose the winners and losers based on decisions made by a board of technocrat supervisors, far removed from public debate or interest.
This conspiracy involves the destruction of three major parts of our water cycle: the oceans, trees, and bacteria. Each part of this cycle is essential for creating clouds and rain, and each are being replaced by industrial solutions with monetary agendas and thus human control. While our oceans are coated in plastic, our trees are cut down, and pesticides are killing off cloud creating bacteria, you are to blame and nothing is being done to fix the aforementioned three.
Step #1 Destroy the Oceans.
Most of water vapor evaporation comes from the uppermost layer of our oceans. A scientific theory known as the “CLAW Hypothesis” states that our planet has a self-regulating system in place for controlling global temperature, cloud cover, and thus rainfall: phytoplankton.  As the Earth warms, more phytoplankton grow, and they produce dimethyl-sulphide (DMS) which is a cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or cloud seed. As more clouds form, the Earth begins to cool, reducing phytoplankton, and the cycle repeats.
In an article titled “Phytoplankton Population Drops 40 Percent Since 1950”  and another titled “What’s happening to the oceans phytoplankton?”  they blame the following:
Losses of diatoms were most significant in the North Pacific, the North Indian, and the Equatorial Indian oceans. The scientists’ study suggested that a likely cause was a shallowing of the mixed-layer by 5.9 feet. The mixed-layer is the uppermost layer of ocean water and a shallowing would reduce the nutrients available for phytoplankton growth. Why the mixed layer shallowed is still uncertain. 
Shallowing of the uppermost layer of the ocean will lead to less evaporation, less DMS, and less phytoplankton. The causes are two major sources: plastics and radiation. The best documented cases of this are the Great Pacific Garbage  Patch and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown . While the Pacific Gyre is the most known, there are actually five major collection zones for ocean plastics affecting phytoplankton growth, and Cesium-137 has coated the entire Pacific ocean leading to the deaths of many essential lifeforms. I believe the combination of these two contaminants has led to less evaporation and less cloud formation.
Here’s where geoengineering comes into play: ship tracks and contrail cirrus! 
International shipping has replaced the phytoplankton DMS cycle with ship tracks: sulfur-lined stratocumulus clouds created by dirty “bunker fuel.” As MIT University states in the title of a recent article “We’re about to kill a massive, accidental experiment in reducing global warming”  where they claim that new international laws reducing fuel-sulfur in shipping will lead to global warming. They all but admit that if it weren’t for ships burning fuels that create clouds thousands of miles long and hundreds of miles wide we would all be in great peril.
In addition, Bill Gates and the Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) Project  are proposing creating fleets of drone boats to spray seawater into the sky to makes clouds whiter which will reflect sunlight and cool the planet, a process known as Solar Radiation Management (SRM). What they fail to mention is this will also double as a scientifically controlled evaporation system.
Finally, the airline industry’s 110,000+ flights per day are dumping trillions of gallons of water vapor in the sky and creating a “subvisual ice haze that is blocking sunlight”  according to Chuck Long from NOAA’s Earth Systems Research Lab. This was covered in a Smithsonian Magazine article titled “Airplane Contrails May Be Creating Accidental Geoengineering.” 
As you can see, Geoengineering clouds and water vapor are replacing the natural ocean evaporation cycle which is dying as a result of pollution, none of which has anything to do with CO2.
Step #2 Cut Down Trees
Three things are necessary for clouds to form and rain to fall: water vapor, static electricity, and dust. Dust in this case is called Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) or cloud seeds. In a recent study by Jasper Kirkby at CERN’s Cosmics Leaving Outdoor Droplets (CLOUD) experiment , they proved that trees were an excellent source of cloud seeds by creating clouds in a chamber using only cosmic rays (electricity), water vapor, and aerosols (dust) from coniferous trees. This basically debunked every climate model on the planet that assumed pre-industrial times were less cloudy.
The results not only point to a cloudier past, but they also indicate a potentially cooler future: If Earth’s climate is less sensitive to rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, as the study suggests, future temperatures may not rise as quickly as predicted.
Some scientists have warned that measures such as scrubbing sulphur dioxide from coal-plant emissions could remove some of the beneficial cooling effect of clouds and boost global warming, but this may now be less of a concern because trees can seed clouds too. “What it means is, we don’t have to fear clean air,” says Stevens.
It is also interesting to speculate whether trees emit these compounds in part because there is a benefit to them in making their own climate, Kirkby says. “This really does touch on the Gaia hypothesis,” he says, referring to the theory that Earth’s life behaves as a single organism that tends to preserve itself. “It’s a beautiful mechanism for trees to control their environment.” 
Nonetheless, trees are being decimated around the globe, especially old-growth forests which are essential to cloud formation and CO2 removal… a double whammy. In the 1930’s the United States of America had serious climate change: The Dust Bowl .
What did we do to fix that climate change? We planted trees:
By 1942, 220 million trees had been planted, stretching out 18,600 miles in a 100-mile-wide zone from Canada to the Brazos River. Even as of 2007, “the federal response to the Dust Bowl, including the Prairie States Forestry Program which planted the Great Plains Shelterbelt and creation of the Soil Erosion Service, represents the largest and most-focused effort of the [U.S.] government to address an environmental problem.” 
The title says it all in an article from November of 2017, “In Nebraska, historic shelterbelts are making way for more crops.”  We fixed the Dust Bowl by planting trees, then decades later we cut them down too. Why? Profits over People and Planet.
Step #3 Kill Cloud Seeding Bacteria: The Monsanto Connection
Not only do trees provide natural cloud seeding but a little know bacteria called Pseudomonas syringae is also a major player in the water cycle and they are being destroyed by industrial pesticides. In an article titled “Genetically Modified Weather: The Tale of FROSTBAN™ Synthetic Bacteria”  by Rick Shankman, he tells of the roots of pesticides and how these frost-creating bacteria are being destroyed. While bad for industrial farms, these bacteria form natural cloud seeds that are essential for the water cycle.
Pesticides like Roundup are sprayed in the billions of gallons worldwide each year, exacerbating this problem. What is the solution? Science of course and patents for genetically modified aluminum resistant seeds!
In 1946 cloud seeding was invented at the General Electrics Laboratory by Irving Langmuir, Bernard Vonnegut, and Vincent Schafer . Since then, cloud seeding has become a worldwide, multi-billion dollar industry replacing natural cloud seeds from trees and bacteria.
Over 50 countries worldwide participate in cloud seeding activities using silver iodide flares burned from aircraft, ground-based cloud seeding generators, dry ice, urea (fertilizer), rockets, cloud ionization generators, and even concrete! 
Anyone with a couple hundred thousand dollars can buy rain, and others (like the military) can decide which countries get no rain at all, also known as a rain embargo like the CIA did to Cuba in 1969. 
Water is life, and it is under their control.
Fix Climate Change today!
As you can see, our natural water cycle is being replaced by scientists and technocrats who seek to control our most precious commodity: water.
It is in our interest to expose these men and their geoengineering activities to restore natural weather before they further control our lives and decide who lives and who dies.
As David Keith, a top geoengineering scientist said:
“If there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program and you put a million tons (of sulfur) a year in (to the stratosphere) you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision. I think that has moral consequences, I don’t sweep that under the rug.” 
Therefore, we need to restore our natural water cycle by cleaning up our oceans, replanting our forests, and banning industrial pesticides or more geoengineering is what we’ll get.
Fixing these three issues will cost less in the long run and ensure a natural path forward.
I hope that you will support my draft legislation “The Environmental Modification Accountability Act” available at https://climateviewer.com/enmod/ as a solution to bring transparency and verification to the secret world of climate engineering. This Act will hopefully shed light on the scope of our current problems, and refocus our attention on fixing climate change today: Clean our oceans, plant trees, and reduce the use of pesticides.
~ Jim Lee
 Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O. and Warren, S. G. (1987). “Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate”. Nature. 326 (6114): 655–661. Bibcode:1987Natur.326..655C. doi:10.1038/326655a0 https://climate-dynamics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/charlson87a.pdf
 Morello, Lauren. “Phytoplankton Population Drops 40 Percent Since 1950.” Scientific American, July 29, 2010. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/phytoplankton-population/
 “What’s happening to the oceans’ phytoplankton?” Blue Planet Society, February 8, 2016. http://blueplanetsociety.org/2016/02/whats-happening-to-oceans-phytoplankton/
 “Great Pacific Garbage Patch.” Wikipedia, Access Date June 19, 2018. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_garbage_patch
 Behrens, Erik, Schwarzkopf, Franziska, Lübbecke, Joke and Böning, Claus W. (2012) Model simulations on the long-term dispersal of 137Cs released into the Pacific Ocean off Fukushima Environmental Research Letters, 7 (3). 034004. DOI 10.1088⁄1748-9326/7/3/034004. https://climateviewer.com/2013/10/22/ten-years-of-fukushima-radiation-crossing-the-pacific-ocean/
 Starr, Steven. “The Implications of The Massive Contamination of Japan With Radioactive Cesium.” ClimateViewer News, October 11, 2013. https://climateviewer.com/2013/10/11/the-implications-of-the-massive-contamination-of-japan-with-radioactive-cesium/
 Lee, James. “‘Accidental Geoengineering’ with Ship Tracks and Contrails.” MIT University ClimateX, March 22, 2018. https://climatex.mit.edu/accidental-geoengineering-ship-tracks-and-contrails • https://climateviewer.com/2018/04/01/accidental-geoengineering-with-ship-tracks-contrails/
 Temple, James. “We’re about to kill a massive, accidental experiment in reducing global warming.” MIT Technology Review, January 22, 2018. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610007/were-about-to-kill-a-massive-accidental-experiment-in-halting-global-warming/
 Lee, James. “The Silver Lining Project: Cloud-making boats, ocean pumps to halt hurricanes?” ClimateViewer News, October 9, 2013. https://climateviewer.com/2013/10/09/the-silver-lining-project-cloud-making-boats-ocean-pumps-to-halt-hurricanes/ • http://mcbproject.org/
 “Airline traffic may help create an icy haze that’s brightening U.S. skies” NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, December 15, 2015 https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/news/2015/121515.html
 Zielinski, Sarah. “Airplane Contrails May Be Creating Accidental Geoengineering.” Smithsonian, December 16, 2015. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/airplane-contrails-may-be-creating-accidental-geoengineering-180957561/
 Curry, Judith. “The cloud-climate conundrum” Climate Etc. June 2, 2016. https://judithcurry.com/2016/06/02/the-cloud-climate-conundrum/ • https://climateviewer.com/2016/06/03/cern-cloud-conundrum-earth-not-warming-as-quickly-climate-models-are-wrong/
 “Great Plains Shelterbelt” Wikipedia, Access Date June 19, 2018. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Plains_Shelterbelt • https://climateviewer.com/2018/05/05/plant-trees-or-geoengineering-will-kill-billions/
 Ryssdal, Kai and Ainpour, Shaheen. “In Nebraska, historic shelterbelts are making way for more crops” MarketPlace, November 28, 2017 https://www.marketplace.org/2017/11/28/sustainability/cutting-down-great-plains-shelterbelt
 Shankman, Rick. “Genetically Modified Weather: The Tale of FROSTBAN™ Synthetic Bacteria.” MIT University ClimateX, November 3, 2017. https://climatex.mit.edu/genetically-modified-weather-tale-frostban%E2%84%A2-synthetic-bacteria • https://climateviewer.com/2018/02/17/how-monsanto-and-weather-modification-are-really-related/
 Lee, James. “Vincent Schaefer, Irving Langmuir, and Bernard Vonnegut invent Cloud Seeding” Weather Modification History, Access Date June 19, 2018. https://weathermodificationhistory.com/vincent-schaefer-irving-langmuir-bernard-vonnegut-invent-cloud-seeding/
 Lee, James “Weather Modification Corporations, Universities, and Derivative Traders” ClimateViewer News, December 10, 2013. https://climateviewer.com/2013/12/10/weather-modification-corporations-universities-and-derivative-traders/
 Lee, James. “CIA Project Nile Blue - Rain Embargo on Cuban Sugar Crops” Weather Modification History, Access Date June 19, 2018. https://weathermodificationhistory.com/cia-project-nile-blue-rain-embargo-cuban-sugar-crops/ • https://climateviewer.com/2018/05/24/henry-kissinger-the-cia-and-weather-warfare/
 Keith, David. “Geoengineering Debate” MIT Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, August 7, 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSCHLwJHwVM
If any of the links above do not work, copy the URL and paste it into the form below to check the Wayback Machine for an archived version of that webpage.