What's Cooking Our Planet in 2016

If you haven’t heard the warnings about climate change you probably live in a cave or watch too much sports.

Greenhouse gas (Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, Tropospheric Ozone, some refrigerants CFC-12, HCFC-22, and Sulfur Hexaflouride (Dielectric fluid) emissions from pollution sources will cause the temperature to rise worldwide which will cause famine, mass migration, and loss of islands and low lying land due to sea level rise.

These greenhouse gases (GHG) are predominantly Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, Tropospheric Ozone, and some refrigerants CFC-12, HCFC-22, and Sulfur Hexaflouride (Dielectric fluid).

Calculations on how hot the planet will get are made in computer “models” which do not possess all the necessary variables to ensure accurate predictions.

Scientists don’t know jack about aerosols.

Research Paper: Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds in ECHAM5-HAM

Aerosol-cloud interactions are one of the main uncertainties in climate research. Up to now a lot of research has been conducted on aerosol-cloud interactions in warm clouds. The impact of aerosols on ice or mixed-phase clouds is much less understood.
Based on the world ending predictions of insufficient models, scientists are now lobbying for a global weather control pollution solution: Geoengineering Solar Radiation Management (SRM). Spraying sulfur-dioxide or nano-particles of aluminum, titanium, or even diamond dust could act as an umbrella and cool the planet.

SRM techniques will alter rainfall patterns worldwide and certainly will kill people. In order to prevent death from a heating planet, we will ensure death with global weather control.

If you think I’m kidding start reading my geoengineering FAQ and article section.

The only thing preventing these mad scientists from spraying our skies legally is international laws, bans on field testing geoengineering techniques, and the belief that pollution emission reduction may prevent the planet from boiling.

However, if we look at the big picture we realize that scientists need to take other factors into account before placing most of the blame on CO2.

I would like to offer some additional computational power for those models:


Don’t blame CO2, blame water

In 1966 the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences from the National Research Council stated in their report “Weather and Climate Modification, Problems and Prospects” that jet aircraft are creating too much water vapor in the stratosphere and that could raise earth’s surface temperature by 1.6 degrees Celsius.
The possibility must be examined that the residence times for stratospheric contamination are so long that significant concentrations can build up from supersonic transport operations. If the contaminants introduced into the lower stratosphere remain there on the average of 10 years (about 10 times longer than is presently suspected), supersonic transports could double the concentration of water vapornaturally present. This would affect the radiation balance, but not in very important degree, according to model calculations of Manabe (1965). Assuming fixed relative humidity, Manabe finds that a five-fold increase of stratospheric water vapor would raise the temperature of the earth’s surface by 1.6°C.
From 1966 to today, scientists know that water vapor is the main
Remark: “The Earth has certainly been warming since we have added so much CO2 to the atmosphere from fossil fuel burning.”Reply: “Forget the CO2. Water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. It controls the Earth’s temperature.”

The addition of the non-condensable gases causes the temperature to increase and this leads to an increase in water vapor that further increases the temperature. - American Chemical Society, “It’s Water Vapor, Not the CO2

Can someone explain to me why water vapor as a greenhouse gas is not mentioned in any IPCC reports?


Chemtrails - Sky Pollution and Cloud Creation by Jet Aircraft

Clouds made by jet aircraft are trapping heat near the surface of our planet and nobody wants to talk about it!

Contrails that turn into cirrus clouds were long thought to cool the planet, however three research reports are now recognizing the heat trapping prowess of these jet-born clouds.

“Contrails formed by aircraft can evolve into cirrus clouds indistinguishable from those formed naturally. These ‘spreading contrails’ may be causing more climate warming today than all the carbon dioxide emitted by aircraft since the start of aviation.” Boucher, O. Atmospheric science: Seeing through contrails, Nature Climate Change 1, 24–25 (2011) doi:10.1038/nclimate1078.
Another researcher said:
“A single aircraft operating in conditions favorable for persistent contrail formation appears to exert a contrail-induced radiative forcing some 5000 times greater than recent estimates of the average persistent contrail radiative forcing from the entire civil aviation fleet.” Haywood, J. M., R. P. Allan, J. Bornemann, P. Forster, P. N. Francis, S. Milton, G. Rädel, A. Rap, K. P. Shine, and R. Thorpe (2009), A case study of the radiative forcing of persistent contrails evolving into contrail-induced cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D24201, doi:10.1029/2009JD012650. – http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2009JD012650/abstract
source: http://www.cosic.leeds.ac.uk/
The pictures show satellite thermal images of the evolving contrail. This was from a case study published by Jim Haywood and colleagues in JGR

And finally, those clouds are now being blamed for Greenland’s ice melts:

However, even the last IPCC report, contrails and contrail cirrus get little mention.

This may be due to the massive finances the aviation industry are throwing at trying to make these clouds stop heating the planet and start cooling them. Here is how the geoengineering of contrail cirrus is already underway:

Scientists Claim Chemtrails are “Accidental Geoengineering”

Sulfur-doped Jet Fuel

Academy of Finland’s FICCA funded COOL Project
“Another technique examined was the use of commercial passenger aircraft flying at high altitudes to inject sulphate aerosols, emitted by aviation fuel, into the stratosphere. This would mimic a volcanic eruption, during which sulphur compounds are released into the stratosphere. They reflect solar radiation and thereby have a clear cooling effect on the climate. No previous calculations are available on the viability of using commercial flights in this way.

“In terms of efficient geoengineering strategies, this technique proved unviable. It would work best close to the equator, but little air traffic operates there – commercial flight routes are operated further north. In addition, current commercial aircraft are unable to fly high enough in the stratosphere. We would need new planes with large amounts of sulphur added to their fuel,” Laaksonen says.

Commercial aircraft could be used to deliever sulfate into stratosphere by increasing fuel sulfur content and the flight altitude of inter-continental flights • The sulfur content of the fuel should be increased to about 50 times the current level to have a significant cooling effect • The cooling effect would be confined to the Northern Hemisphere

Jet Biofuel Enlisted for Contrail Control

Contrails might be a punch line in the culture these days, thanks to the imaginative folks who have rechristened them “chemtrails” and embroidered them with elaborate theories involving government and corporate misdeed.

But contrails are pretty serious business for a less conspiratorial reason: scientists believe these ice clouds generated by water exhaust gases from aircraft engines could have a real impact on the climate, perhaps by cooling temperatures during the day and warming them at night.

When contrails spread to form cirrus clouds, they can persist for hours and extend over areas of several square kilometers. These “contrail cirrus,” which artificially increase Earth’s cloudiness and become almost indistinguishable from natural cirrus, are among the most uncertain contributors to the Earth’s radiative forcing. (Radiative forcing is defined as the change of the net radiating flux resulting from changes in the atmospheric composition. A measure of the perturbation of Earth-atmosphere energy budgets, it is widely used as a climate metric).

Cirrus Cloud Seeding with Pepto Bismol?

Introducing Thermal Radiation Management (TRM) or the removal of high, cold cirrus clouds Day 1 – Could we? Climate Engineering Research Symposium – July 7-10 2015
“Jon Egill Kristjansson told us about the fine line a potential cloud seeder would have to walk by seeding small, homogenous ice nuclei in cirrus clouds, which then cool the planet by letting more long-wave radiation out, but making sure not to “over-seed“, as injecting too many nuclei would mean reduced solar reflection and subsequently more warming. We heard that although initial modeling on cirrus cloud “thinning” in this manner indicates that the method is scientifically feasible, as one member of the audience pointed out, very little is known about its technical feasibility. The creation of small, homogenous ice nuclei in cirrus clouds could cool the planet, but a multitude of questions remain regarding how, where and under what conditions such particles can be successfully created.”

source: http://folk.uib.no/ngfhd/EarthClim/Calendar/Oslo-2012/Muri_EarthClim_2012.pdf


More Info:


High Power Microwaves


Apparently, high power radars and ionospheric heaters are making artificial aurora in the skies and upsetting the ionosphere which is having an impact on climate change. Here is my map of high-power microwaves (HPM) world wide:


In this paper, scientists discuss the effects of terrestrial radars and VLF transmitters on climate change:

Rydberg microwave emission of ionosphere during precipitation of electrons from the radiation belts caused by radio transmitters

Industrial greenhouse effect is usually suggested as a cause of global rise of the surface temperature over the last few decades. In this paper we propose to draw attention the new anthropogenic component – influence of powerful radio transmitters (navigation and communication) on the particles in radiation belts of the Earth. This anthropogenic factor affects mainly the electrons from inner and outer belts over the cyclotronic frequencies i.e. frequencies of the Larmor precession. These frequencies belong to very low frequency (VLF) range: from few to few tens kilo Hertz.

Surface transmitters with such frequency have power up to 1 Mw that cause precipitations and result in optical emission above the transmitter. Intensity of these emissions is of the same scale with the aurora of the class two or more in the international IBC II system. Thus, precipitations simulated by VLF transmitters we suggest to consider as anthropogenic analogue of the aurora caused by magnetic storm.



I fully agree ionospheric heaters like HAARP and Tromso as well as anti-ballistic radars are cooking our skies. However, hardly any research has gone into understanding how microwaving our water vapor sky is really affecting climate change. Furthermore, despite the research paper’s claim, I know of high power transmitters with 6 megawatts of power, and at least a thousand with more than 1 Mw of power. If we ever took the time to understand how much aggregate power we are putting into our skies, the figure would blow your mind.AWESOME VLF: GQD Skelton, UK Frequency: 22100 Hz Callsign: GQD Locator: IO84nr BBC Skelton Broadcasting Station locateb bewteen Carlisle City and Penrith Town. A transmitter park used mainly for short-wave broadcasts. Many 350kW Transmitters installed in Skelton. It contains the second tallest structure in the UK, a 365m (1200ft) mast used to send coded messages to Royal Navy submarines.


AWESOME VLF: NLK Oso Wash, Jim Creek, Washington, USA Frequency: 24800 Hz at 1200 kW Callsign: NLK Locator: CN98ae The primary mission of this radio site is to provide VLF radio transmitting capabilities for the Pacific submarine fleet. Established in the 1950s, the 1.2 million watt transmitting system developed for the site remains 'state -of-the-art' in producing low frequency emissions world-wide. In fact it is one of the most powerful transmitters in the world. Located near Arlington, Washington, in the foothills of the Cascades, north of Seattle, the site has 5,000 largely forested acres.

AWESOME VLF: NAA Cutler, Maine, USA Frequency: 24000 Hz at 1800 kW Callsign: NAA Locator: FN64ip Cutler Naval Station has a transmission power of 1800 kW, making it the most powerful VLF-transmitter in the world. The transmission consists of a continuous encrypted FSK (F1B) signal at 200 baud. The transmitter operates on 24.0 kHz. In the past it operated on 17.8 kHz.

Naval Communications Station Harold E Holt



Now you know what’s cooking with climate change in 2016. Spread the word.

Sharing is Caring