Geoengineering and Weather Modification Exposed

Geoengineering and Weather Modification Exposed

The most extensive research on Geoengineering and Weather Modification experiments worldwide, with articles, maps, and timelines to fully expose the hidden world of Weather Control.

This page is a table of contents for Jim Lee’s research on Geoengineering. All of the information on this page is backed up by references, feared by trolls and geoengineering lobbyists alike, and is the most accurate literature on who’s controlling your weather, why they are doing it, and where.

For the uninitiated, prepare yourself to be shocked.  For you veterans of the Climate Engineering activism world, our articles, maps, and timelines will answer many of your burning questions and help you connect the dots.

As the media distributes pro-geoengineering propaganda in a political climate ruled by fear, the Lord’s of Weather (geoengineering lobbyist’s) are suggesting coating our skies with sulfur, aluminum, titanium, and diamond dust to block the sun and cool our planet. While acknowledging that Geoengineering Solar Radiation Management will alter rainfall patterns worldwide and likely kill people, the Lord’s of Weather ignore the cold hard facts: after 60 years of cloud-seeding, nobody has ever produced any proof of its efficacy. Billions of dollars are spent worldwide altering clouds with silver iodide and other chemical nano-particles despite the fact that cloud seeding likely does not work. Even worse, all of the separate cloud seeding programs worldwide could be altering our weather in dangerous ways where the butterfly effects of aggravated clouds destroy property and end lives, even the CIA is worried about weather warfare. Despite numerous lawsuits over weather modification activities, most losses are blamed on “nature” as there is little transparency or accountability.  With a cloud-seeding’s terrible track record, how could anyone support geoengineering SRM’s uncontrolled global weather manipulations. To make matters worse, Bill Gate’s geoengineering money is also funding Hurricane Hacking efforts blurring the lines between Geoengineering and Weather Modification.

Geoengineering the sky has been a worldwide phenomenon since the start of commercial aviation. Ships and jet aircraft are covering our skies in man-made clouds.  Despite 60 years of jet planes making clouds, aviation-induced cloudiness, persistent contrails, contrail cirrus, and aerosol-cloud interaction are barely understood with today’s best supercomputers and are not properly accounted for in IPCC models.  The aviation industry knows this, and jet aircraft-produced contrail cirrus clouds are now being actively experimented on using two main concepts: doping jet fuel with sulfur and cirrus cloud seeding to melt these clouds away.  Contrail cirrus clouds trap heat and likely are a greater threat than CO2 so scientists are experimenting with jet biofuels and flight routing to engineer clouds that cool the planet. This active experiment goes on everyday, over your heads, with over 100,000 flights a day worldwide and zero accountability.

Space Weather Modification is also gaining more publicity.  When upper atmospheric nuclear explosions were banned back in the 1950’s, the U.S. military still hell bent on replacing our fickle ionosphere with something more reliable decided to dump millions of needles in space to create their own.  The West Ford Needles project failed, and to this day millions of needles can be found floating in space or buried in ice at our poles.  Next the military began using sounding rockets and satellites to create heavy ion clouds in space by dumping Barium, Strontium, and Sulfur Hexaflouride into our ionosphere.  Military radio technicians could heat these chemical releases in space with the ionospheric heater at Arecibo, Puerto Rico and “see” our ionosphere.  Today, the top ionospheric heater worldwide HAARP fires electromagnetic missiles into our Van Allen belts and scrapes out radiation using the “Christofilos Effect” learned back in the 1950’s nuclear blasts. Dubbed “radiation belt remediation” ionospheric heaters are sold to politicians and the public as a back up plan for Solar Flares or High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse attacks, however foreign governments are very concerned about the military capabilities of these ionospheric heaters, with the Russian government going as far as to say HAARP could “have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating entire regions.” Despite these dire warnings, the practice of heating chemical releases in space is just “a conspiracy theory.”

This page is an effort to raise awareness of atmospheric experimentation and to lobby for transparency in the geoengineering and weather modification industries, and hopefully to see an end to weather control efforts, both intentional and unintentional, in hopes that one day my child will see natural weather.

Let one thing in nature stay natural, hand’s off our sky.

Who’s Pushing Geoengineering SRM?

Check out the following two images below to see maps of who is researching and funding geoengineering solar radiation management.

Geoengineering Sponsors


Information on funding bodies is only available for 34% of our data from 2008 onwards and requires extensive cleaning. However, information on the approximately 319 organizations listed in the funding acknowledgements provides useful insights into the underlying, and commonly hidden, networks of funding for research. Based on the available publication data, climate engineering research funding is dominated by the US National Science Foundation (NSF), the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), the European Commission, the US Department of Energy and NASA with the National Natural Science Foundation of China appearing seventh in the rankings. Figure 3 (ABOVE) displays the network of organizations funding SRM research acknowledged in two or more publications. (Note that the size of nodes indicates number of publications, not amount of funding.) This reveals a tighter concentration around the NSF, the European Commission and NASA. The scientific literature for climate engineering in general, but also that on SRM in particular, is dominated by research from public funding organizations. However, research is also being supported by non-governmental organizations such as the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER) [6668], which is funded from a gift by Bill Gates to the University of Calgary, and the Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation for research on sea spray geoengineering and marine cloud albedo [43,69]. We would emphasize that decisions on collaborations are typically made by individual researchers and reporting of collaborations may be limited. These networks are hidden from research funding organizations and hidden, beyond immediate collaborations, from researchers themselves. There has been relatively little strategic, directed research into climate engineering. It will be important for ongoing governance debates to keep watch on who is funding what, whether explicitly as top-down research on climate engineering or in emergent, bottom-up and often unnoticed networks of collaboration.

Research funders in the UK and elsewhere increasingly emphasize the pursuit of commercial innovation and spin offs from research. Patents provide a primary indicator of research and development directed towards potential commercialization but have received limited attention in the existing literature.

Image and caption source:

Oldham P, Szerszynski B, Stilgoe J, Brown C, Eacott B, Yuille A. 2014. Mapping the landscape of climate engineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140065 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0065) [PMC free article][PubMed]

Geoengineering Researchers


Following data cleaning, we identified approximately 1961 authors of publications in our Web of Science data. The majority of authors (1343) are publishing on CDR, with 401 authors for SRM and 325 authors for general geoengineering. Figure 2 (ABOVE) displays a network map of co-authors of SRM-only research, with colours denoting communities based on the strength of co-authorship relations. Note that links (edges) in the network layout may transect unrelated nodes. In total, we identified 81 communities (including single-author isolates). The top ranking author, based on the number of publications, is Ken Caldeira, beginning with research with Govindasamy addressing radiative forcing [64], followed by influential work on climate-carbon simulations of geoengineering [62] and culminating, in our data, with consideration of the trade-offs in SRM arising from regional variations in its effects and equity considerations [65]. Work by Robock in the same cluster, focusing on Regional climate responses to SO2 injections, argues against Arctic and tropical geoengineering because of impacts on precipitation and food supply in Asia and Africa [37] and, with Kravitz, has more recently addressed sea spray geoengineering [66].

The networks of researchers working on climate engineering, including those working on SRM, comprise both senior researchers who have turned their attention to climate engineering, and junior researchers, usually working with senior colleagues, who would more obviously define themselves as ‘climate engineering researchers’. A focus on networks of researchers and organizations is a logical focus of governance measures, as are the funding organizations supporting this work, to which we now turn.

Image and caption source:

Oldham P, Szerszynski B, Stilgoe J, Brown C, Eacott B, Yuille A. 2014. Mapping the landscape of climate engineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140065 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0065) [PMC free article][PubMed]


Geoengineering programs, proposals, experiments, field trials, and weather modification programs worldwide.
Read More


Geoengineering researchers, universities, companies, and weather modification derivatives trading.
Read More


Geoengineering, weather modification, and space weather modification patents from 1891 to present.
Read More

Who’s Controlling Your Weather?

Weather modification is a worldwide industry with airplanes and ground-based cloud-seeding generators burning chemicals to add more seeds to clouds with the hope that these aerosols will create rain, snow, or even make hail smaller.  Billions of dollars are spent each year on this completely unpredictable practice.  In the sections below you can check out the Weather Modification Associations conferences, see reports of actual weather modification experiments, read the largest list of climate engineering patents, and see a corporate roster of companies involved in controlling your weather.


Weather Modification Conferences

15th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification (2001)

16th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification (2005)

17th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification (2008)

18th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification (2011)

19th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification (2013)

20th Conference on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification (2015)

Weather Modification Experiment Map

For a detailed analysis, check out our spreadsheet of Reported Weather Modification Activities in the USA (2004-2012) with Sponsors (who paid for the weather control), Operators (who manipulated the weather), where it happened, and when:

Google Fusion Table
(This spreadsheet is a work in progress. When complete a downloadable version will appear here.  Stay tuned!)  

Weather modification activities worldwide are also available on our map apps.

Climate Viewer 3DView Map  Climate Viewer MobileView Map


Geoengineering 101

The Clarity Clause: A Solution

A draft legislation to end atmospheric modification without notification:

When atmospheric nuclear testing was banned in 1963, no verification system existed. In 1996, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty created the International Monitoring System (IMS) consisting of 337 forensic seismology, hydroacoustics, infrasound, and radionuclide monitoring stations around the world to listen for the distinct sounds of nuclear explosions. Trust but verify.

When weather warfare was banned at the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) in 1976, no verification regime was ever created.

We cannot detect rogue geoengineering, cannot verify that cloud-seeding projects produce provable results, or even predict the weather with any certainty because accurate computer models are lacking and too many individuals are altering the weather for it to every be predictable.

Climate scientists would have you believe that extreme weather can surely be blamed on CO2 while never acknowledging all the weather experiments overhead. This is insanity.

We demand verification of the ENMOD ban by building a global sensor network to detect intentional and unintentional weather modification sources as well as detect all atmospheric chemical releases. In addition, we will amend ENMOD to require atmospheric experiments be publicly announced prior to initiation:

To protect life from man-made weather events all nations shall:

  1. Create a “multilateral registry of cloud seeding, geoengineering, and atmospheric experimentation events with information and data collection on key characteristics” and publish hourly updates on activities to a publicly available website and create an atmospheric sensor network for verification.
  2. Require nations/states/persons to notify the multilateral registry (at least) 24 hours prior to initiation of atmospheric experimentation/modification to ensure public notice, and liability should said experimentation/modification cause monetary, environmental, or physical losses.
  3. Verify the chemical composition of our atmosphere with a global network of sensors with data publicly available.

Help expose the secret world of climate engineering by learning the history, teaching your friends, and sharing this page.

Together we will bring clarity to our increasingly chaotic skies.

Geoengineering TV

Geoengineering Articles

Want More?

See All Geoengineering Archives

Looking for HAARP?

See Our HAARP Page


Feel free to call me at +1.803.450.4305 or use this form to send an email to Jim Lee.


"The Earth is not dying, it is being killed. The people killing it have names and addresses." ©2015 Climate Viewer News LLC, All Rights Reserved | Powered by RedNET

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?